As Catholics throughout the world face closed doors at church, our Lenten fast has changed. We think of Lent as a time of giving up bad things and engaging in deeper prayer. Abstaining from attending Mass would not seem to fit this bill, but it actually has a deep history in the Church.
To this day, the liturgical season of the West has two days without the celebration of Mass: Good Friday and Holy Saturday (at least with no proper Mass of its own before the Vigil). This reflects an even older tradition of not celebrating the Mass during the weekdays of Lent (or limiting Mass to certain days of the week), a custom preserved in some of the Eastern rites of the Church.
It may seem illogical to abstain from the greatest good we have in the world, but sometimes we have to sacrifice something to in order to appreciate it more deeply. Josef Ratzinger reflects upon Augustine’s decision to “excommunicate himself” at the end of his life to undertake a deeper penance. He reflects how abstaining from the Eucharist could lead to renewal:
Do we not often take the reception of the Blessed Sacrament too lightly? Might not this kind of spiritual fasting be of service, or even necessary, to deepen and renew our relationship to the Body of Christ?
The ancient Church had a highly expressive practice of this kind. Since apostolic times, no doubt, the fast from the Eucharist on Good Friday was a part of the Church’s spirituality of communion. This renunciation of communion on one of the most sacred days of the Church’s year was a particularly profound way of sharing in the Lord’s Passion; it was the Bride’s mourning for the lost Bridegroom (cf. Mk 2:20). Today too, I think, fasting from the Eucharist, really taken seriously and entered into, could be most meaningful on carefully considered occasions, such as days of penance—and why not reintroduce the practice on Good Friday? It would be particularly appropriate at Masses where there is a vast congregation, making it impossible to provide for a dignified distribution of the sacrament; in such cases the renunciation of the sacrament could in fact express more reverence and love than a reception which does not do justice to the immense significance of what is taking place.
A fasting of this kind—and of course it would have to be open to the Church’s guidance and not arbitrary—could lead to a deepening of personal relationship with the Lord in the sacrament. . . Naturally, I am not suggesting a return to a kind of Jansenism: fasting presupposes normal eating, both in spiritual and biological life. But from time to time we do need a medicine to stop us from falling into mere routine which lacks all spiritual dimension. Sometimes we need hunger, physical and spiritual hunger, if we are to come fresh to the Lord’s gifts and understand the suffering of our hungering brothers. Both spiritual and physical hunger can be a vehicle of love.”
Behold the Pierced One, pages 97-98, posted at Catholic World Report
There is, of course, a difference between an aliturgical day with no proper Mass of its own and having what is called a Mass of the Presanctified, where there is no consecration but still Communion, using hosts from a previous Mass–most famously on Good Friday. An example of aliturgical days can be seen in the Ambrosian rite of Milan, which traditionally did not celebrate Mass on Fridays during Lent.
I first encountered the second tradition in high school, serving the Liturgy of the Presanctified in the Byzantine Rite during Lent. These liturgies, primary occurring primarily on Wednesday and Friday evenings, have many similarities to Vespers services and are conducted with dim lighting, giving them, as I recall fondly, a somber and mysterious character: chanting the psalms, the incense arising above the candle light, and the great prostrations, accompanied by the prayer of St. Ephraim the Syrian:
{Making a prostration} O LORD, Master of my life, grant that I may not be infected with the spirit of slothfulness and inquisitiveness, with the spirit of ambition and vain talking.
{Making a second prostration} Grant instead to me, your servant, the spirit of purity and of humility, the spirit of patience and neighborly love.
{Making a third prostration} O Lord and King, grant me the grace of being aware of my sins and of not thinking evil of those of my brethren. For you are blessed, now and ever, and forever.
Although now celebrated predominantly in the East, these services claim their origin from the great liturgical figure, Pope St. Gregory the Great. This connection may simply stem, however, from the description he wrote of the Presanctified liturgy while serving as ambassador to Constantinople. Either way, both East and West share this tradition, whether on Good Friday alone, on every Friday of Lent (as in the Ambrosian Rite) or throughout the weekdays of Lent (as in the Byzantine tradition). Some of the faithful have also undertaken the tradition of the Missa sicca (dry Mass), preserved mostly by Carthusians, which entails reading the prayers of the Mass (minus the Eucharistic prayers) when Mass cannot be celebrated (or in addition to Mass).
We now all find ourselves undertaking an involuntary Eucharistic penance. Christ is in the tomb, not only three days, but now for extended period of time, withdrawn from physical intimacy with his disciples. Deprived of a sacramental closeness to Jesus, we must face a spiritual dark night, one that can actually inspire deeper love and devotion. This Eucharistic fast may become the greatest sacrifice of all. If we offer it as a voluntary sacrifice, this absence, turned into an act of love, may also become the most fruitful one.
3 Comments
Thomas Coffey · April 4, 2020 at 8:35 am
The traditions of restraining Mass during lent are intended to increase our piety and understanding. What the bishops are doing is a direct rejection of God by stating that He is not essential to our physical wellbeing as well our spiritual. Our attendance at Holy Sacrifice of the Mass has been put aside and declared non essential . We don’t need to sacraments according to the Bishops but our money for them still remains essential.
Jared Staudt · April 4, 2020 at 9:51 am
Thomas, there is also a long history of curtailing the sacramental life of the Church during times of epidemic. We did it during the 1918 flu epidemic and St. Charles Borromeo cancelled Masses during an outbreak of the plague. Here is a piece I wrote about this: https://denvercatholic.org/the-two-forties-the-eucharist-within-quarantine-and-lent/. However, I agree that everything that is possible should be done to support the faithful during this crisis and I support the creative ways that parishes are offering confessions and leading prayer.
Jacinta · April 4, 2020 at 5:05 pm
I have heard no Bishop say the Mass or God is not essential. The Bishops are doing what the Lord is asking of them and that is obedience. They are protecting our lives as Catholics. What would you do if Masses were not suspended and most of the bishops and priests in the world were to come down with the virus and die and we would be with out Mass for maybe years? A lot of people just think about what they want and not what is for the good of all. This was a hard decision for them to make and still is very hard for them. We need to pray for them even more during this time. At the same time there are other spiritual foods that we learn from Jesus and that we are still able to do. They are doing the will of the Father by listening to our Church authorities and reading Holy Scripture. Let us all practice the virtue of obedience during this time. Also take advantage of the sacrament of Confession if you are able since it is still available in most places. I want to leave you with this Bible scripture: “And whereas indeed he was the Son of God, he learned obedience by the things which he suffered.”-Hebrews 5:8