I was recently interviewed by Catholic News Agency and the Philadelphia Inquirer about St. Joseph’s University new Certificate in Cannabis Studies. I raised moral questions about this, because, even when legalized for medical purposes, marijuana has been used primarily for “getting high” rather than addressing medical issues. This does not necessarily mean that any use of the cannabis plant is immoral, of course. Using cannabis to get high as a recreational drug is a sin. Its medical use is possible but there are several issues. News articles, however, can only offer soundbites, so I would like to give my fuller response to this issue.

Here is my complete response to the problem of a certificate in Cannabis Studies:

Views on cannabis use are changing quickly in the United States, even though it remains illegal according to Federal law and many state laws. The Church does recognize the therapeutic use of drugs, although medical marijuana laws have been abused for recreational purposes and its use lacks careful medical study and supervision. Accordingly, I do not believe it is appropriate for a Catholic university to offer a Cannabis Studies certificate, because the Church teaches that the use of drugs constitutes a sin against the Fifth Commandment. The impairment of mental functioning strikes at the very heart of our humanity and capacity for free, rational action.This program is scandalous, because the definition of scandal is action that leads another to sin, and the promotion of a certificate in Cannabis Studies will do exactly this, encouraging the further normalization of cannabis use, with a damaging impact on the health of body and soul.

I know that many people argue that cannabis use is therapeutic for pain, although this has not been established medically at this point, and there are numerous studies that cast doubt on its effectiveness in treating pain at all. Cannabis use also increases other health problems, including with the heart. Health risks are particularly severe before the brain completes development and the legalization of marijuana has normalized its use, leading more young people to try it. It has been presented to voters that legalizing marijuana would lead to a decrease of illegal activity in the trafficking and selling marijuana, although this has not materialized. Also, a high number of medical users actually use it for recreational purposes. I do not, therefore, think it is morally appropriate to offer this certificate, because it participates in the use of a harmful substance for either recreational or questionable medical purposes. Financially there are difficulties because cannabis is still illegal under Federal law, and there is still much illegal activity in the distribution of cannabis. In Colorado, for instance, illegal activity has increased, not decreased, since legalization.

If cannabis were proven to be an effective means of combating pain, which is disputed, and it could be administered in a way that could be effectively managed for the good of patients, without leading to long term damage in the life of patients, such as a diminishment in mental capacity, it could, like other substances, be considered moral. Pope Francis has stated that the legalization of drugs will not stop the problem of drug abuse and will lead to further problems. The problems with SJU’s program is that cannabis remains in a gray zone, subject to criminal production and distribution, while also lacking the clear backing and supervision of the medical field. 

Just like any therapeutic drug, cannabis could be used for medical purposes if it was established that it is effective, was legally normalized, and its use was supervised properly by doctors. The way we have legalized medical marijuana, however, has led to a huge influx of recreational users getting medical prescriptions. 10% of adults in Oklahoma, for instance, have a permit to use medical marijuana. Even though Oklahoma voters just rejected legalizing recreational marijuana, partly because they have seen the effects of medical usage, they don’t even need to legalize recreational because anyone who wants it can get it. I saw the effects of marijuana legalization first hand in Colorado and it was the beginning for a serious cultural decline in the State. For a Catholic university to enter into this situation is problematic. If cannabis could be used with better oversight and in way that mitigates against the long term diminishing effects, such as becoming a”stoner,” I would find that acceptable, but I do not see that happening now.


7 Comments

Donald Link · March 16, 2023 at 8:10 am

So does oxycodeine. Our theologians probably need an update on their knowledge of pharmacology. Also, there are variations on the term “get high”. A bit more research in this area would probably be beneficial.

    Jared Staudt · March 16, 2023 at 8:23 am

    I think you’re right to make a link there. It’s true that theologians needs to attend to those details, but pharmacology and medicine could also use some more theology and ethics. Look at what is happening with the abuse of opioids!

Stephen F. Gambescia · March 22, 2023 at 12:13 pm

Great to see that someone has the courage to speak out against the commercialization of what will become our next public health crisis.

While opinion polls show that the public is open to cannabis use for medicinal purposes and even for recreational use, federal authorities still consider it to be a Schedule I substance, given its high potential for abuse and because it has no medicinal value.

We should know that medical marijuana laws were passed out of compassion for people suffering from diseases and conditions such as cancer, PTSD, Alzheimer’s and AIDS. In fact, several of the acts are titled the “Compassionate Care Act.” It is understandably unpopular to be against something that will help ease or placate conditions or diseases that plague people, but this does not change the fact that no medical body has endorsed its widespread use, and the federal agencies charged with drug control have not lifted their concerns for the dangers of this substance.

The competition to see what legislator or candidate can be the most liberal and the ring of the tax cash register has brought legislators clamoring to get on board the marijuana sales gravy train. Similarly, advocates to free marijuana are giddy about beating the ostensible Puritanesque propaganda that keeps pot out of our hands.

Surprisingly, few healthcare and public health groups or leaders are pushing back on this. Changing sociocultural attitudes toward marijuana does not obviate the need to see credible scientific evidence that normalizing pot will be a major public health threat.

Jacob Green · September 7, 2023 at 10:35 am

If cannabis is a sin then why was Jesus using it to cure “tremors” (aka seizures) and “blindness” (aka glaucoma). Are these the sins that Jesus died for? I’m not a Catholic but I’ve studied history to the best of our archeological knowledge… According to the original hebrew texts of the bible which call for this ingredient (Cannabis) we’ve established the theological (and potentially medicinal) value for thousands of years. Your arguments seem baseless. Site some research for the readers please! According to what study has cannabis been established to not have any effect for pain patients? According to what study has it been proven to have no benefits for glaucoma patients? According to what study does it have no benefits for epileptics? According to what study does it have no effect on cancer or leukemia patients? What were their methods? Has anyone else from a different political background done similar studies? In antiquity was the cannabis “high” specifically referred to? Where do you draw the line between “side effect” and “high”? Is the whole cannabis plant sinful just because it contains a specific molecules that cause a cognitive effect or is it just the group of compounds causing the cognitive effect that are considered sinful? You said yourself that you’d consider it in a different light if we could isolate therapeutic benefits. How can Catholics urge or help society do isolate those benefits without formally studying the plant?

Is it possible to drink alcohol without becoming drunk and disorderly?

Food for thought. (:

    Dana J · December 29, 2023 at 5:10 pm

    As a nurse practitioner who gives medical cannabis certificates, I think that the altered mental state you are referring to is misunderstood. Many substances cause altered mental states: narcotics, antihistamines, SSRIs, mood stabilizors, benzodiazepines, sleeping pills, and many more. Cannabis is an anti-inflammatory plant. It literally reduces inflammation in the body. Proof of this is a reduction in glaucoma eye pressures. Just because there is a lack of credible research doesn’t mean that it doesn’t help pain. It absolutely does!! Please remember that if you can grow your own medicine, you might not need big pharma or big alcohol. That’s who did a hit on this plant that God gave us.

      Bruder Lynn · March 3, 2024 at 1:03 am

      I’m an avid Catholic. I use cannabis as a medicine were all have failed. I’ve been fighting mental illness since the age of 4. Been on a rainbow of medications and treatments. Until my therapist suggested cannabis. That high is just a side effect. Did you know that Thorazene causes a “high” or Halopiradol? There is thing in psychiatric hospitals called a B 52 to control psychotic patients. Benadryl Haloperidol and Ativan. I can tell you they cause sedation relaxation and calmness. The exact same response I get from cannabis but without the drugged up feeling. With cannabis I get those affects but with a clarity. Obviously the church needs to look at Antipsychotics and other psychiatric drugs before they call cannabis dangerous or mind altering.

SATVRDAY EVENING EDITION – Big Pulpit · March 18, 2023 at 1:21 pm

[…] Is Medical Marijuana Moral? – R. Jared Staudt, Ph.D., at Building Catholic Culture ‘Diversity Takes Precedence Over […]

Leave a Reply