The Catholic Church, along with every major Protestant denomination, has witnessed a precipitous decline in Church attendance. This slide, set off during the 1960s, has accelerated with the rapid rise of the “nones,” Americans claiming no religious affiliation. We could wonder, has the bottom fallen out with this huge exodus? Or put more theologically, has Christ abandoned his Church? Moments of crisis test us, calling us to exercise great hope and trust in the Lord’s providence. Even though Jesus told us that he will never abandon us, he also calls us to do our part. We are not simply helpless in the current freefall. We can assess why things have gone off track and then adjust, focusing our attention on what can help us reverse course.

In taking stock of the crisis, Stephen Bullivant traces the steps of our decline for us, drawing together the many contributing factors, in his book Mass Exodus: Catholic Disaffiliation in Britain and America since Vatican II (Oxford, 2019). Bullivant describes the major forces —both internal and external — that have combined to form a perfect exit storm. Huge cultural changes certainly set the backdrop. One surprising example stems from the breaking up of ethnic Catholic enclaves in cities in favor of the more isolated and anonymous suburbs. Alongside of unprecedented upheaval in society, confusion also reigned for decades in the Church following the Second Vatican Council, which stemmed from a revolution in worship, conflicts over morality, a collapse of catechesis and a flight from the priesthood and religious life — all leading to general turmoil. More recently, revelations about the cover up of the sex abuse crisis and a growing distance between doctrine and society have alienated even more Catholics.

It’s been a rough 60 years, with so many self-inflicted wounds. Since the early 1960s, when 75% of Catholics attended Mass regularly, there has been a steady, annual decline in attendance to less than 25%. Catholics went from having clear identifiers of belief and practice within a strong community that anchored a whole way of life to a very changed landscape with few demands, incentives or cultural practices to support faith. The drift of Catholics to other churches or to no religion at all, Bullivant explains, should be seen in terms of an identity crisis, with every element of Catholic belief and practice seen as up for grabs (178).

People need God — we simply cannot be truly happy without him — and so must reach and serve our own people more effectively. Bullivant sheds light on this effort too, pointing to what worked before so many left. Catholic parishes of the past offered a “close-knit community-life,” augmented by a “richly elaborate devotional” practice (88). In fact, respondents to many recent surveys sought greater community and simply could not find it at their parish. Keeping Catholics active in the faith involves more than just Mass attendance. In particular, people remain much more engaged when there is social integration into the parish and meaningful ties to other parishioners (95). Parishes of the past also provided opportunities to see the faith lived in meaningful ways, through something Bullivant describes as Credibility Enhancing Displays (CREDS) — actions and practices that manifest belief, often involving sacrifice (102). CREDS, such as nocturnal adoration, the Friday penance and processions, make faith come alive by drawing it into daily life.

What can we do differently to stop the “Mass” exodus? For one, we should focus on evangelization first — sharing the good news of salvation in relationship with Christ. Without a living faith in God, why would anyone care to listen to information/rules from the Church or come for worship? To grow in the faith, mentorship has been found much more effective than instruction (particularly when done by parents). If the classroom has been the model for catechesis in the past, we now need to think much more in terms of apprenticeship. We need a more dynamic approach — banding together with a motivated mentor and peers, sharing life together, living the faith actively and serving others. It is time to move out of the classroom in favor of small group settings (preferably in the home), which are more ideal to personally engage content. Mass has become a lost treasure, and to help people rediscover it, we must build a stronger community to surround it.

Bullivant also speaks at length about liturgy and the legacy of Vatican II. If the Mass is the heart of culture, as I often contend, how could drastic changes not destabilize the Church? Bullivant points out the whole point of the liturgical reform was to engage more people and increase participation in the life of the Church. It is not really a point of argumentation that the opposite has happened. Since the close of the Council and the liturgical changes following, there has been a great decline in Mass attendance and, as should be clear, faith and devotion as well. We do not have a fervent Church, even for those who still attend and we are marred by a loss of a sense of the sacred.

Looking back reveals that Catholics have assimilated into our culture, influenced more by its ethos and priorities. To reengage the lost faithful, we need to communicate a compelling, imaginative vision of what it means to be a Christian in the modern world and why life will be better if we accept this vision and live within it. For the faith to stick, it must be woven into the very fabric our lives and supported by community. Only if we help Catholics to accept and internalize faith and live it every day of the week can we prevent them from becoming another statistic within the legion of “nones.” Catholics may have left in a mass exodus, but the return will happen by engaging our lost brethren one at a time.

Note: A previous version of this piece was published at denvercatholic.org as part of my Catholic Culturalist column.


2 Comments

Terrell D Lewis · August 17, 2021 at 3:23 pm

The Catholic Church, along with the Evangelicals have become a wholly owned subsidiary of the Republican Party. It’s fortune and reputation have been tied to the fortune and reputation of the Republican Party and, as the Republican Party’s reputation has suffered, the Church’s reputation has suffered along with it.

Rather than loving people to Christ and setting an example to follow, the Church abandoned Christ and the Gospel in favor of working with one political party. Instead of the Gospel, they worked to pass laws to control people’s behavior who don’t believe the Gospel, and now don’t care to listen to the Gospel.

Instead of catechism, they threatened to deny communion to those who disagree with them. Instead of serving others in the Name of Christ, they sought to control them.

I am an officer in several veteran’s groups and in the NAACP, an all of these groups are careful to not be seen as political. We need to work with whomever is in office to secure the rights of our members, if we invite a Democrat to speak, we are careful to invite a Republican and so forth. These secular organizations are smarter than the American Catholic Church.

    Jared Staudt · August 17, 2021 at 3:29 pm

    Catholics in the United States have much stronger connections to the Democratic Party. It is only recently that Catholics have been shifting their political allegiance due to the Democratic Party’s prioritization of abortion, even to the point of excluding pro-life Democrats from the party. Anyone who does not believe in the Catholic faith, has committed a mortal sin, or who publicly and gravely contradict its teaching should not receive communion. That is a consistent teaching of the Church for 2,000 years (I know because I’ve read the early Church Fathers) and not tied to party politics. A very prominent example from history is St. Ambrose stopping the Emperor Theodosius from even entering the church, let alone receiving communion. He had to do public penance to be reconciled.

Leave a Reply